An entry ban or immigration blacklist prevents a foreign national from entering Vietnam for a specified period or, in some cases, indefinitely.
Entry bans can arise for many reasons, including visa overstays, immigration breaches, employment or work permit issues, sponsor-related matters, administrative decisions, criminal investigations, unpaid fines, inaccurate immigration records, or other circumstances considered relevant by the competent Vietnamese authorities.
Sometimes the reason for an entry ban is explained clearly. In other cases, individuals only discover that they have been blacklisted when they are refused boarding by an airline or denied entry at a Vietnamese airport or border crossing.
Understanding why the restriction exists is often the first and most important step in determining whether there is a realistic prospect of having the matter reviewed.
Detailed assessment of your visa overstay >
SJP conducts a comprehensive assessment of your visa overstay, including its duration, the circumstances that led to the breach, any penalties imposed, exit records, and any resulting immigration restrictions.
Where appropriate, we prepare a professionally structured petition supported by relevant evidence and present your circumstances to the appropriate Vietnamese authorities. Our objective is to identify the most effective lawful pathway towards resolving the matter and, where possible, restoring your ability to enter Vietnam.
Professional Assistance Following Deportation >
Being deported from Vietnam does not necessarily mean you will never be permitted to return.
SJP assesses the circumstances surrounding your deportation, reviews the available evidence, and advises whether there is a realistic basis for seeking a review of any resulting immigration restrictions. Where appropriate, we prepare and present your case professionally through the proper legal channels.
Outstanding Immigration Fines >
Outstanding immigration fines can create unexpected barriers to future travel and re-entry.
SJP assists clients by confirming the status of outstanding penalties, identifying any associated immigration restrictions, and advising on the correct legal process for resolving the matter. Where appropriate, we assist in preparing supporting documentation to facilitate future immigration applications.
Confidential Review and Help >
Working without the appropriate visa or work authorisation can result in significant immigration consequences.
SJP carefully reviews your employment history, visa status, work permits, employer documentation, and any enforcement action taken. We assess the circumstances of your case, prepare supporting documentation where appropriate, and advise you on the most appropriate legal pathway to resolve the matter and minimise future immigration restrictions.
Sponsor-Related Immigration Problems >
Immigration difficulties can sometimes arise through issues involving employers, sponsors, or sponsoring organisations.
SJP reviews your sponsorship history, identifies any compliance concerns, and prepares appropriate documentation to help resolve disputes, clarify immigration records, and support lawful pathways towards maintaining or restoring your immigration status.
Immigration Administrative Bans >
Administrative bans may arise for a variety of immigration or compliance reasons and can prevent future travel to Vietnam.
SJP reviews the basis of the restriction, identifies the available legal options, and advises whether there may be a realistic pathway towards having the matter reviewed by the competent Vietnamese authorities.
Review of all Exit Records and Issues >
Administrative or recording errors can sometimes affect future travel to Vietnam.
SJP reviews your immigration movement history, exit records, and supporting documentation to identify any inaccuracies or unresolved issues. Where errors are identified, we prepare formal submissions supported by appropriate evidence to assist the relevant authorities in reviewing and correcting the record.
Incorrect or Missleadling Immigration Records >
Incorrect information recorded on an immigration file can have serious consequences.
SJP carefully reviews the available records, identifies factual inaccuracies, gathers supporting evidence, and prepares formal submissions requesting that the relevant information be reviewed. Our objective is to ensure your circumstances are presented accurately and fairly.
Comprehensive Immigration Review >
Every successful case begins with a clear understanding of the facts.
SJP conducts a detailed and confidential review of your immigration history, supporting documentation, previous decisions, and any relevant legal or administrative issues. This assessment enables us to provide honest advice regarding your circumstances and determine whether there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
Professional Immigration Assistance for Foreign Nationals Refused Entry to Vietnam
Whether you have been deported, blacklisted, refused entry at an airport or border crossing, or are simply unsure why you cannot return to Vietnam, SJP Consultancy provides confidential, professional advice to help you understand your situation and the options that may be available to you.
Being refused entry to Vietnam or discovering that your name has been placed on an immigration blacklist can be a stressful and uncertain experience. Whether you were refused boarding by an airline, denied entry at a Vietnamese airport or border crossing, or informed that you are subject to an immigration restriction, you may have been given little or no explanation about why the restriction exists or what options are available to resolve it.
At SJP Consultancy, we specialise in assisting foreign nationals who have been refused entry to Vietnam or who are subject to an immigration entry ban or blacklist. Trusted by expats since 1998, we have assisted expatriates, business owners, investors, retirees and international families to understand their circumstances and, where appropriate, seek a review of immigration restrictions through the appropriate Vietnamese authorities.
Every case is unique. There is no standard solution, and there is no automatic process for having an entry ban or blacklist removed. Success depends on the individual circumstances of each case, the available evidence, and the willingness of the competent Vietnamese authorities to review the matter.
Our role is to assess every enquiry honestly, provide realistic and practical advice, and only accept matters where we genuinely believe there is a reasonable prospect of achieving a positive outcome. Where we agree to act, we work diligently to prepare and present the strongest possible case on your behalf.
Where we agree to represent a client, our work begins with a detailed review of all available information and supporting evidence.
We identify the issues requiring attention, prepare the necessary documentation, and present your circumstances as clearly, accurately, and professionally as possible.
Depending on the nature of your matter, this may include preparing formal submissions, clarifying factual issues, obtaining additional supporting evidence, addressing misunderstandings, and assisting the relevant Vietnamese authorities in reviewing your case.
Throughout the process, we keep our clients informed and provide updates whenever meaningful progress has been made.
For more than 28 years, SJP Consultancy has assisted expatriates with complex legal and immigration matters throughout Vietnam.
Over that time, we have developed professional relationships with senior officials and earned a reputation for handling sensitive matters with professionalism, integrity, and discretion.
Our experience enables us to understand how complex immigration matters are considered, the importance of accurate documentation, and the value of presenting every case professionally.
We have also established longstanding professional relationships with individuals working within the Immigration Department, the Police Service, and the Ministry of Public Security. These relationships assist us in communicating effectively and understanding the procedures involved in reviewing complex matters.
However, all decisions relating to Vietnam entry bans and blacklist removals are made solely by the competent Vietnamese authorities in accordance with Vietnamese law. Our role is to prepare, support, and present your case professionally—we cannot and do not guarantee any particular outcome.
Navigating Vietnamese immigration laws can be complex and time-sensitive. SJP regularly provides strategic counsel and legal representation to foreign nationals, international corporations, and expatriates encountering critical immigration challenges, including:
Entry Bans & Blacklist Removal: Legal intervention and petitioning for entry restrictions, administrative bans, and official blacklist status.
Deportation & Overstay Resolution: Representation regarding visa overstays, removal orders, and administrative immigration fines.
Border & Port-of-Entry Denials: Immediate assistance for transit issues, visa cancellations, and entry refusals at airports and land borders.
Work Permits & Corporate Sponsorship: Resolving compliance disputes, employer sponsor issues, and work authorization complications.
Record Rectification & Complex Cases: Correction of inaccurate government records and management of multi-agency regulatory matters.
Every client matter is unique. We evaluate every case individually to formulate a strategy tailored to your specific circumstances.
Every engagement begins with a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment. Before formalizing representation, our legal team conducts a thorough review of your documentation and history to determine whether there is a realistic prospect of securing a favorable resolution.
To enable an accurate preliminary review, clients are requested to submit:
Passport Bio-Page & Identification: High-resolution copy of your current passport.
Immigration History: Details of previous Vietnamese visas, along with full entry and exit records.
Official Documentation: Relevant correspondence from immigration authorities, employer/sponsor records, or police/court documents (where applicable).
Factual Timeline: A concise, chronological narrative of the events leading to the immigration issue or entry restriction.
If our assessment indicates a viable path forward, we will outline our proposed legal strategy, the anticipated procedure, expected timelines, and our fixed professional fees before any formal work begins.
If we determine that a case lacks a realistic prospect of success, we will tell you directly. We hold ourselves to the highest ethical standards, believing that candid, accurate advice serves your best interests far better than false expectations.
SJP regularly assists foreign nationals facing a wide range of immigration-related issues, including:
Every matter is assessed individually because no two cases are ever the same.
Every enquiry begins with a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment.
During this stage, we carefully review your circumstances to determine whether we believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
Our assessment normally includes:
The more information you provide, the more accurately we can assess your situation.
If we believe we can genuinely assist, we will explain our proposed strategy, the anticipated process, and our professional fees before any work begins.
If we do not believe your case has a realistic prospect of success, we will tell you honestly. We believe realistic advice is far more valuable than false hope.
We believe in being transparent about what we can and cannot achieve.
For clients whose matters we agree to accept, approximately 80% achieve a successful outcome.
This reflects our careful assessment process. We do not accept every enquiry simply to generate professional fees. Instead, we generally proceed only where we believe there is a realistic prospect of success based on the available evidence and the individual circumstances of the case.
While we are proud of our track record, every matter is different, and past success does not guarantee future results.
We believe in being transparent about what we can and cannot achieve.
For clients whose matters we agree to accept, approximately 80% achieve a successful outcome.
This reflects our careful assessment process. We do not accept every enquiry simply to generate professional fees. Instead, we generally proceed only where we believe there is a realistic prospect of success based on the available evidence and the individual circumstances of the case.
While we are proud of our track record, every matter is different, and past success does not guarantee future results.
For more than 28 years, we have assisted expatriates with complex legal and immigration matters in Vietnam.
Every enquiry begins with a confidential, no-obligation assessment to determine whether we believe we can genuinely assist.
We only accept matters where we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a successful outcome.
If we do not believe we can help, we will tell you openly before you commit to our services.
Every enquiry is handled with complete discretion, professionalism, and respect for your privacy.
Our commitment to honesty, professionalism, integrity, and exceptional client service has guided our work since 1998.
A British national contacted SJP Consultancy after being refused permission to return to Vietnam following a prolonged visa overstay that resulted in deportation and an immigration entry restriction.
His inability to return to Vietnam had separated him from his Vietnamese wife and young daughter, creating significant personal and emotional hardship.
Before accepting the matter, SJP conducted a comprehensive assessment of the available information, including immigration records, previous visa history, supporting documentation, and the circumstances that led to the overstay.
Following that assessment, we concluded there was a realistic basis upon which the matter could be presented for consideration by the competent Vietnamese authorities.
The client had:
Although the immigration breach itself was not disputed, the surrounding circumstances required careful explanation and supporting evidence.
SJP Consultancy prepared a structured case that focused on the complete circumstances surrounding the client’s immigration history.
Our work included:
Every stage of the matter was conducted professionally and respectfully in accordance with Vietnamese law and established administrative procedures.
Following consideration by the competent Vietnamese authorities, the client’s immigration restriction was reviewed.
The client was subsequently permitted to return to Vietnam under the conditions determined by the relevant authorities, allowing him to reunite with his wife and daughter after a prolonged period of separation.
Every immigration matter is different.
In this case, several factors contributed to the positive outcome, including:
This case study is provided for general information only.
Every immigration matter is assessed individually.
Past success does not guarantee future outcomes.
SJP Consultancy only accepts matters where, following assessment, we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
If you have been refused entry to Vietnam or believe you are subject to an immigration entry ban or blacklist, contact SJP Consultancy for a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment.
A 53-year-old Australian business owner from Melbourne contacted SJP Consultancy after being deported from Vietnam and made subject to an administrative entry ban.
The client had lived and operated a legitimate business in Vietnam for approximately three years. During that time, he became engaged to a Vietnamese national, and together they had a young child.
The client believed his immigration status had been managed correctly by an immigration agent acting on his behalf. However, he later discovered that false and misleading information, together with inaccurate supporting documentation, had allegedly been submitted to the Vietnamese Immigration authorities without his knowledge during previous visa applications.
The matter only came to light when the client attempted to register as the legal father of his Vietnamese-born child. During routine administrative checks, Immigration identified irregularities in his visa history, resulting in his arrest, detention, deportation, and the imposition of an administrative entry ban.
Following a detailed assessment of the available evidence, SJP Consultancy accepted instructions to represent the client.
The client faced several significant obstacles:
Although the client accepted responsibility for ensuring his immigration affairs were properly managed, he maintained that he had been unaware that inaccurate information had allegedly been submitted on his behalf.
The case therefore required careful preparation to distinguish the client’s personal conduct from the actions of the third-party agent.
SJP Consultancy undertook a comprehensive review of the client’s immigration history, business activities, and personal circumstances.
Our work included:
Throughout the matter, SJP Consultancy maintained regular communication with the client while ensuring that all submissions were professionally prepared and supported by appropriate evidence.
Following a review by the Ministry of Public Security and the competent Vietnamese authorities, the client’s administrative entry ban was overturned.
The review process took 127 days from the client’s initial engagement with SJP Consultancy until the final decision was issued.
The client was subsequently permitted to return to Vietnam lawfully, allowing him to reunite with his fiancée and young child and begin rebuilding both his family life and future business activities.
Every immigration matter is different, and no two cases are identical.
In this matter, several factors were significant:
One of the most important lessons arising from this case is that expatriates should never assume that an immigration agent has completed visa applications correctly.
Many foreign nationals sign documents prepared entirely in Vietnamese without fully understanding their contents. Others rely on low-cost immigration services that may fail to comply with Vietnamese immigration requirements.
Even where mistakes are made by third parties, foreign nationals may still face serious consequences, including detention, deportation, visa cancellation, and administrative entry bans.
For this reason, SJP Consultancy encourages all expatriates to ensure they understand the basis of every immigration application submitted on their behalf and to seek professional advice whenever uncertainty exists.
This case study has been anonymised to protect client confidentiality. Certain identifying details have been changed or omitted while preserving the essential facts and legal issues.
Every immigration matter is assessed individually.
Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.
SJP Consultancy only accepts matters where, following a detailed assessment, we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
If you have been deported, refused entry, or believe inaccurate information has affected your immigration status in Vietnam, SJP Consultancy offers a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment.
We provide honest advice, realistic assessments, and professional representation for clients facing complex immigration matters.
A 71-year-old Canadian citizen contacted SJP Consultancy after being deported from Vietnam and made subject to an administrative entry ban following a prolonged visa overstay of approximately 54 months.
The client had lived in Nha Trang for several years and was in a genuine long-term relationship with a Vietnamese national. In October 2022, the couple welcomed the birth of a healthy baby boy.
Fearing that he would be required to leave Vietnam and unable to imagine being separated from his partner and young son, the client failed to renew his 90-day e-Visa. Rather than disclosing the situation, he concealed his unlawful immigration status from his partner while they continued making plans to marry.
The matter eventually came to the attention of the authorities during a routine residential compliance inspection, where Immigration officers discovered that the client had significantly overstayed his visa.
Following enforcement action, the client was deported and prohibited from returning to Vietnam.
He contacted SJP Consultancy on 3 January 2026 seeking advice on whether there was any lawful pathway that might allow him to reunite with his family.
This was a particularly complex matter.
Although the client maintained a genuine family relationship in Vietnam, he was not recorded as the child’s legal father on the Vietnamese birth registration.
Before any humanitarian submissions could be made, it was necessary to establish the family relationship through independent evidence.
The client also faced:
The case therefore required extensive factual investigation before any formal representations could be prepared.
SJP Consultancy undertook a detailed review of the client’s immigration history and family circumstances.
Our work included:
The submissions presented the complete circumstances of the case, balancing the seriousness of the immigration breach against the humanitarian considerations and the evidence supporting the client’s genuine family relationship.
Following a full review of the evidence and submissions presented, the Ministry of Public Security reconsidered the client’s case.
The review process concluded with the client being permitted to return to Vietnam under specific conditions determined by the competent authorities.
The client was granted a two-year Temporary Residence Card (TT) and required to marry his long-term Vietnamese partner within 90 days of his lawful return to Vietnam.
He returned to Vietnam on 1 July 2026, where he was reunited with his fiancée and young son at Tan Son Nhat International Airport after many months of separation.
Every immigration matter is different.
In this case, several important factors were carefully documented and presented:
Attempting to conceal an immigration breach often makes matters significantly more difficult.
Many expatriates overstay their visas because they fear the consequences of leaving Vietnam or believe they can resolve the issue later. Unfortunately, prolonged overstays frequently result in deportation and administrative entry restrictions.
This case also demonstrates the importance of documentary evidence. Humanitarian circumstances alone are rarely sufficient. Where family relationships form part of a petition, independent evidence establishing those relationships can be essential.
Early professional advice can often prevent relatively straightforward immigration issues from developing into much more complex matters.
This case study has been anonymised to protect client confidentiality. Certain identifying details have been changed or omitted while preserving the essential legal and factual issues.
Every immigration matter is assessed individually.
Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.
SJP Consultancy only accepts matters where, following a detailed assessment, we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
If you have overstayed your visa, been deported, or believe an immigration restriction is preventing you from returning to your family in Vietnam, SJP Consultancy offers a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment.
We provide honest advice, realistic assessments, and professional representation for clients facing complex immigration matters throughout Vietnam.
An expatriate contacted SJP Consultancy after remaining in Vietnam beyond the expiry of his visa for approximately four years. The prolonged overstay resulted in significant immigration consequences, including administrative penalties, deportation, and restrictions on returning to Vietnam.
The client had established a life in Vietnam and wished to return lawfully. However, uncertainty surrounding his immigration status and the resulting entry restrictions made the situation appear extremely difficult.
Before accepting instructions, SJP Consultancy carried out a detailed assessment of the client’s immigration history, supporting documentation, and the circumstances that led to the overstay.
Following that assessment, we concluded there was a realistic basis upon which the matter could be professionally presented to the competent Vietnamese authorities.
The client faced several significant obstacles, including:
Given the seriousness of the immigration breach, careful preparation and presentation of the client’s circumstances were essential.
SJP Consultancy undertook a comprehensive review of the matter before preparing a structured case for consideration.
Our work included:
Throughout the process, every aspect of the case was prepared carefully, professionally, and in accordance with Vietnamese law.
Following a detailed review by the competent Vietnamese authorities, the client’s circumstances were reconsidered.
The client was subsequently able to return to Vietnam lawfully, allowing him to rebuild both his personal and professional life after a prolonged period of uncertainty.
The outcome demonstrated the importance of careful preparation, complete supporting documentation, and presenting the circumstances of each case accurately and professionally.
While every immigration matter is different, several factors contributed to the successful outcome:
This case study has been published for general information only.
Every immigration matter is assessed on its own individual facts and circumstances.
Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.
SJP Consultancy only accepts matters where, following a detailed assessment, we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
If you have overstayed your visa, been deported, refused entry, or believe you are subject to an immigration restriction in Vietnam, SJP Consultancy offers a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment.
Our role is to provide honest advice, assess whether there is a realistic path forward, and, where appropriate, prepare and present the strongest possible case on your behalf.
A 35-year-old British national contacted SJP Consultancy after being deported from Vietnam and made subject to an administrative entry ban following an incident at a nightclub in Ho Chi Minh City during October 2025.
At the time of the incident, the client was lawfully employed as an English language teacher at a kindergarten in Ho Chi Minh City and held the appropriate immigration status to live and work in Vietnam.
Following a police operation at the venue, the client was detained and underwent drug screening. Although subsequently released while further enquiries were conducted, the incident ultimately resulted in the termination of his employment, cancellation of his immigration status, deportation on 15 January 2026, and the imposition of an administrative entry ban.
The client approached SJP Consultancy on 23 May 2026 seeking advice on whether there was any realistic prospect of returning to Vietnam.
Following a detailed assessment of the available evidence, we concluded that there were sufficient legal and factual issues to justify a formal review of the matter.
The client faced several significant challenges:
The central issue was whether the available evidence justified the immigration consequences imposed and whether there were sufficient grounds to request a review of the administrative decision.
SJP Consultancy carried out a comprehensive review of the case before preparing formal submissions.
Our work included:
Our submissions did not seek to minimise Vietnam’s strict drug laws. Rather, they focused on whether the available evidence, viewed as a whole, justified maintaining the administrative entry restriction in the client’s particular circumstances.
Following consideration of the matter, the Ministry of Public Security reviewed the client’s case.
On 20 July 2026, the administrative entry ban was lifted.
The client was subsequently permitted to return to Vietnam lawfully.
His Temporary Residence Card and work authorisation were re-issued, and his former employer chose to reinstate his employment as an English language teacher.
As part of the conditions associated with his return, the client agreed to undergo random drug testing for a period of eighteen months, a requirement he accepted willingly.
Every immigration matter is unique.
This case involved several important considerations, including:
The matter demonstrates the importance of assessing the complete circumstances surrounding an immigration decision rather than relying solely on initial assumptions.
Vietnam maintains strict laws relating to controlled substances, and foreign nationals should be aware that being present in environments where illegal drugs are being consumed may expose them to significant immigration consequences.
Individuals should avoid situations where illegal drug use is taking place and should seek professional legal advice immediately if they become involved in any police investigation or immigration enquiry.
Early advice and careful preparation can be critical when seeking a review of administrative immigration decisions.
This case study has been anonymised to protect client confidentiality. Certain identifying details have been changed or omitted while preserving the essential legal and factual issues.
Every immigration matter is assessed individually.
Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.
SJP Consultancy only accepts matters where, following a detailed assessment, we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
If you have been deported, refused entry, or are facing an immigration restriction following a police investigation or administrative decision, SJP Consultancy offers a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment.
We provide honest advice, realistic assessments, and professional representation for clients facing complex immigration matters in Vietnam.
A 46-year-old American businessman contacted SJP Consultancy after being unexpectedly refused entry to Vietnam during what he believed would be a routine visa run.
The client had lived and worked in Vietnam for several years and had completed numerous visa extensions and border crossings without incident. He had never been informed that there were any issues with his immigration status and had repeatedly been told by agents that “everything was fine.”
When he attempted to return to Vietnam following a routine border crossing, he was refused entry without any detailed explanation.
Confused and unable to obtain meaningful information, he approached SJP Consultancy to determine what had happened.
Unlike many immigration matters, the client had not committed any serious immigration offence.
Instead, our investigation suggested that historical immigration records contained administrative inaccuracies and incomplete information that had accumulated over a number of years.
Although each issue appeared relatively minor when viewed individually, together they created uncertainty within the immigration system and ultimately resulted in the client being refused entry.
Cases of this nature are more common than many expatriates realise.
Many foreign nationals rely entirely on visa agents and assume that every application has been completed correctly. Unfortunately, errors made years earlier may remain undiscovered until Immigration carries out a detailed review.
SJP Consultancy conducted a comprehensive review of the client’s immigration history.
This included:
Rather than simply requesting that the client be allowed to return, our objective was to identify the underlying cause of the refusal and resolve the problem at its source.
Following a detailed administrative review, the relevant immigration records were clarified and updated.
Once the discrepancies had been addressed, the client was able to submit a fresh visa application and lawfully return to Vietnam without further immigration difficulties.
Correcting the underlying records removed the uncertainty that had prevented the client from travelling and provided greater confidence for future visa applications.
Many expatriates believe that if they have not overstayed their visa or been deported, they cannot have immigration problems.
Our experience suggests otherwise.
Over many years we have encountered numerous cases involving:
Individually these issues may appear insignificant.
Collectively they can result in unexpected visa refusals, delays, or refusal of entry.
Never assume that because you have previously entered Vietnam without difficulty, your immigration records are entirely accurate.
Many clients only discover administrative problems during a visa run, when they are already outside Vietnam and unable to resolve the issue immediately.
If you have experienced unexplained visa refusals, repeated delays, or an unexpected refusal of entry, the underlying issue may not be obvious.
A detailed review of your immigration history may identify problems that can be addressed before they become more serious.
This case study has been anonymised and is representative of the types of immigration record correction matters regularly handled by SJP Consultancy. Certain facts have been combined from multiple matters to protect client confidentiality while accurately reflecting the legal and administrative issues commonly encountered.
Every immigration matter is assessed individually.
Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.
SJP Consultancy only accepts matters where, following a detailed assessment, we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
If you have been refused entry without explanation, experienced repeated visa refusals, or believe your immigration records may contain inaccurate or incomplete information, SJP Consultancy offers a confidential, no-obligation initial assessment.
We will review your immigration history, identify potential issues, and provide honest advice about the options available to you.
No. The decision rests solely with the competent Vietnamese authorities. No legitimate consultant can guarantee the removal of an entry ban or blacklist.
We carry out a detailed assessment of your circumstances and only accept matters where we genuinely believe there is a realistic prospect of achieving a positive outcome.
There is no standard timeframe. The duration depends on the complexity of the case, the available evidence, and the review process of the relevant authorities.
We normally request your passport details, previous visa history, immigration correspondence, and any documents that help explain the circumstances leading to your entry ban.
Not necessarily. Payment of a fine may resolve one aspect of a matter, but it does not automatically remove an immigration restriction or blacklist.
Yes. Many clients contact us without knowing why they have been refused entry. Our initial assessment is designed to help identify the likely cause and determine whether there may be a realistic path forward.